Shattock v Devlin
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
| Shattock v Devlin | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | High Court of New Zealand |
| Full case name | W R Shattock (senior) First Plaintiff, B A Clements Second Plaintiff, W R Shattock (junior) Third Plaintiff v E J Devlin First Defendant, J P McDonnell Second Defendant, The Attorney-General sued in respect of the New Zealand Police Third Defendant |
| Decided | 8 January 1990 |
| Citation(s) | [1990] 2 NZLR 88 |
| Court membership | |
| Judge(s) sitting | Wylie J |
| Keywords | |
| negligence | |
Shattock v Devlin [1990] 2 NZLR 88 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the defence of Implied license to enter a property to a trespass claim.[1]
References[edit]
- ^ McLay, Geoff (2003). Butterworths Student Companion Torts (4th ed.). LexisNexis. ISBN 0-408-71686-X.
 | This article relating to case law in New Zealand is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |